You have acquisition interest – now what?

Through TechStars, my other investments or just at random, I’m often approached by entrepreneurs who want advice on what to do when a potential acquirer first brings up the idea of buying their company. Often, the company being targeted for acquisition is “up and coming” and is very early stage. For that reason, the entrepreneurs are often rightfully concerned that the “acquirer” is really just digging for information. That’s a valid concern for many early stage companies. Here’s the advice I usually give concerning this situation.

 

Step 1. Assess the acquirer. First and foremost, you should assess the potential acquirer. Can you really see yourselves working with them? Do you like them? Are you willing to be an employee of that company? Do you trust that their interest is genuine? If the answer is no, recognize that it’s either a non-starter or that it’s going to take one heck of an offer to pique your interest.

 

Step 2. Notify the board. Notify your board and/or key investors. If you have a board of directors, you should promptly notify them (email is fine). You might also notify key trusted advisors and mentors. Make sure to mention that the interest is very early, and that you’re exploring it. As always, getting mentorship can be key.

 

Step 3. Set your number. Next, if you haven’t already done it, you should have an honest discussion with your co-founders and key management about the minimum number it would take for you to sell the company. When doing this exercise, it’s useful to think about the following issues:

  • Talk about the stock/cash mix that would be required.
  • Talk about how long you’d be willing to work for the acquirer at market salary. Assume at least two years.
  • Assume that you’ll have no ongoing control of your company or product, and that it just won’t be your baby in any way, shape, or form any more.

 

Recognize that it’s very easy to trick yourself at this stage. It’s really important to define the minimum number without padding. In other words, you’re effectively deciding that if the offer clears this hurdle, then as a team you want to work towards taking it.

 

Step 4. Engage the acquirer. When you first enter into discussions with the potential acquirer, you should expect them to ask you all sorts of questions before they make any sort of offer. You can expect questions about revenues, expenses, headcount, conversion rates, attrition rates, and all sorts of detailed stuff.

 

At this point, it will be your natural reaction to ask for an NDA with the acquirer. While this is a good instinct, delay doing it up front. Don’t worry – you will use it as leverage shortly. Without mentioning an NDA, provide a few high level answers that you’re comfortable with them knowing and when the questions get into the “zone of discomfort” ask them to provide a detailed list of their questions via email so that you can work on them.

 

Step 5. Ask for the ballpark offer. Now that you’ve answered just a few high level questions and have a more detailed list of what they’re after, it’s important to go for the “ballpark” offer before proceeding. Explain that you’ve received their email, you’re obviously flattered with their interest, and that you’re happy to answer all of their questions under two conditions. The first condition is that you’d like all of the information that they requested to be covered by an NDA. The second condition is that before proceeding, you would like for them to provide the likely “ballpark” paramaters of the acquisition via a simple email, including the likely cash/stock split.

 

Most acquirers will happily accept the first condition (not doing so is a serious red flag) but will avoid the second condition. It’s important to stand firm on both conditions before proceeding. The acquirer will likely claim that they don’t have enough information to make an offer, and that they need their questions answered. Assuming that you’ve given them basic revenue and expense figures, this is bullshit. Hold firm. Explain that you’re very busy working with customers and improving your product, and that you can’t afford to distract the company without having at least a ballpark understanding of the offer. Explain that it’s obviously non-binding and that you won’t hold them to it, but that you’re just trying to get a sense of it. Sometimes there is a little dance at this stage, where they will look for a couple more tidbits of information in order to give this ballpark offer. That’s fine – use your best judgement. Just avoid dropping your pants completely until you get the ballpark offer. Note that this does not mean sign the NDA and give them all the answers that they’re seeking! This is your leverage to get the ballpark offer, so don’t give it away. Recognize that the NDA won’t protect you from giving the “fake acquirer” exactly what they wanted.

 

If the acquirer resists the NDA or the ballpark offer, they’re probably just fishing. You’re not being difficult. You’re asking a perfectly reasonable question about ballpark deal terms before wasting your time.

 

People who are not high up enough in the acquiring company to actually be making this offer will be scared off at this point. That’s a good thing. Perhaps they never had permission to be pursuing an acquisition in the first place. This technique weeds those people out since they have to provide the non-binding ballpark offer in writing via email.

 

Don’t proceed without the ballpark offer.

 

Step 6. Identify mentors. Now that you have a ballpark offer, you have what I would consider serious interest. Now make sure that you’re working with someone who has been involved in multiple acquisitions, ideally on both sides of the table. Perhaps one of your existing investors or advisors can fill this role. It’s critical to have someone on your team that can help you negotiate terms, and to help you understand their impacts. I can tell you from experience that when I had my first exit from a company I founded, I left millions of dollars on the table before I learned this lesson. Do not underestimate the ability of experienced mentors to greatly increase your ultimate outcome. If you don’t have an advisor, contact someone that you trust that has done this before and ask them to help. It’s fine to pay for this help if you don’t have other options, but you should only pay in a success case and you should recognize the dynamic that this creates: 1) This person loses nothing if there is no exit other than time and 2) they’re motivated to help you maximize the exit at the expense of everything else.

 

Step 7. Assess the ballpark offer. Take the floor value of any “range” that they gave you for both the total comp and the cash percentage of the stock/cash split. This is all you should “hear” – ignore the rest of the range. The actual offer is very likely to end up being very close to the low end of the range unless there are multiple competing offers. You should now compare this to what you discussed in Step 3. If the offer isn’t high enough to be interesting, then your best bet is to simply tell them that and politely decline to provide any other information.

 

Step 8. Get to know them and answer their questions. At this point, the offer is “interesting.” Your goal now should shift to getting some face time with the acquirer and getting to know them on a personal level. It’s fine to do this by phone, but find ways to spend time with them physically. This will help you figure out if they are “for real” or not. Ideally, if practical you’ll start to this before fully “dropping your pants” and answering all of their questions. It’s a fine line between being coy and stalling. You can’t stall too long, but you can offer to meet with them personally to go through their questions. Basically, the more time you spend with the potential acquirer, the more you can develop trust and build from there. Provide the requested information under NDA to continue the process. Be sure to mark all information provided as confidential under the NDA. Keep a copy of everything that you provide.

 

Step 9. Push for a term sheet. Even at this stage, many acquirers will go silent for a long period of time. Sometimes this is normal – these things just take time. Internal fires that have nothing to do with you come up. People go on vacation. Things always move slowly. Do not assume this is going to happen. Keep building your business in the meantime. Continually push for a term sheet fully describing the acquisition. At every meeting, ask what information you can provide to work towards getting a definitive term sheet describing the acquisition.

 

Step 10. Decide. If at any point in the discussion you decide that something is not right, just stop. Ask for the return of confidential information, and politely bow out. If the deal happens – congratulations! Assume it won’t until it actually has.

 

Good luck! I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences in the comments.

 

Approaching 1 Billion Documents with MongoDB

a worthy read if into nosql

Goodbye to the office

http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/06/goodbye-to-the-office.html

Is Your VC Founder Friendly?

The role of a founding CEO in a startup searching for a business model is radically different than a CEO building and growing a company. Some VC’s get it, others may not. So if you’re the founder of a startup, you may want to consider who you take money from.

 

Is Your VC Founder Friendly?
How do you figure out which VC firm is best for you?  Here are five questions to consider.

 

  1. What startup stage do they typically invest in?
  2. Do they “get” Customer Development?
  3. Who do they have as advisors?
  4. How many of their founders are still with their company?
  5. Will they tailor your vesting to your contribution as a founder?

 

What Startup Stage Do they Invest In?

Ask potential investors which stage they invest in.

 

Certain VC’s like the new class of Super-Angels and small VC funds specialize in the early stage of a startup where you are searching for a business model. And some larger funds that specialize in later stage deals may have a partner or two who likes to invest at this stage. (Some VC’s invest solely on technology breakthroughs and assume they’ll find a market later.)

 

Early stage investors have different insights then those investing in a later stage. They understand that now’s not the time to hire a senior VP of Sales to start to scale the sales force or to look for a finance department to create income statements that say zero each month. These VC’s are skilled in helping you search for the business model.

 

If they haven’t done many early deals before a business model is found, ask them why they are interested in you?  Is it for your technology? Your potential business model?

 

Do They Get Customer Development?
For a founder there’s nothing worse than searching for a business model day after day and then sitting in a board meeting with a VC who asks about some detail of year 5 of your revenue plan.

 

Ask potential investors, how will they measure progress for the company and you as a CEO? Do they have metrics and a methodology they use for early stage companies that differs from companies that have already found a business model?  Have they heard about Customer Development? Lean Startups? Can they tell you what you should be doing in Customer Discovery and Customer Validation? If not, do they have a better methodology?

 

Who Do They Hang With?
Investors who have successful ex-founders who you can call for advice, grab a coffee with or get on your advisory board is a good sign. (And a sign that their ex-founders still like them.)

 

VC’s who have ex-CEO’s who took over from the founder and built the startup into a multi- $100 million company can give great advice about your growing company’s infrastructure, but if you are still searching for your first customer, they may not be much help. (In fact, unless they’ve been founders themselves they usually provide bad advice.) VC’s with formerly high-ranking government officials and Fortune 1000 CEO’s as advisors may be wonderful to help you grow your company in a later stage but not helpful now. (Unfortunately the odds of you being the CEO at this future stage are pretty low.)

 

How many of their founders are still with their company?
Most early stage VC’s are betting on the founders to both deliver the product and to find the business model. At this stage, firing the founder is not a strategy, it’s an act of desperation.

 

By the time the company gets to the build-stage (the Transition) what differentiates VC’s is how many turn the founders into builders versus relying on bringing in new, more experienced management to lead the transition. As a founder, you should ask: What percentage of the firm’s companies still have founders as the CEOs?  In any active role?  If the number is less than 25%, you may want to think twice. Ask to talk to some of the founders who are no longer with their startups. I’ll bet you get some interesting stories.

 

Will The VC Tailor Your Vesting to Your Contribution?
Most founders don’t make it past the build stage in a startup. Almost invariably the new CEO will comes in and complain about how disorganized the place is and then does a wonderful job in putting policies and procedures in place. Yet none of this would be possible if the founder hadn’t created the company in the first place. Typical vesting of your stock is over a four-year period, yet the founder’s contribution is heavily weighted to the first few years.

 

Over the years I’ve become a bigger and bigger believer in some sort of accelerated vesting for the founders tied to finding the business model. There have been suggestions of a different class of stock for founders here and good general advice in VentureHacks here.

 

All these suggestions are written as if you had a choice of who to take money from. Most of the time you’ll take whosever check will cash. But if you do have a choice, asking these questions will keep you from being surprised in a board meeting.

 

Lessons Learned

  • What phase of the company lifecycle are you?
  • What phase do your VC’s typically invest in?
  • What type of advisors does your VC have?
  • What percentage of this firm’s former founders are still running their companies?
  • What metrics are they going to use to measure progress in a board meeting?

 

good advice

Arduino + Android = Fun Weekend

http://www.amarino-toolkit.net

How I Judge Investors

Pitching your startup to investors is a deeply personal matter.  More often than not, they––politely or not––call your baby ugly. And that hurts. Good founders, I think, learn to not take the criticism too personally. But in the end, it is personal. They are judging you. And your baby. Thumbs up, or thumbs down. 

 

And such is life. But how should we, as founders, judge them? Not all investors  are created equal, after all.  Once betrothed, the investor––unlike the entrepreneur––is unfirable, a step-father to your newborn startup, an undivorceable spouse in an epic marriage.

 

Like any proud founder, I am extremeley protective of my newborn startup. She's my motherfucking baby, after all. 

 

Now, I don't claim to have years business knowledge or even neccesarily have it right––I'm doing this for the first time––but I do have my own formula. 

 

"Do I want this guy on my board?" This, above all else, is the question. 

 

Another way to put it: When the shit hits the fan, do I want to be accountable to this guy? Do I want this to be the guy who has my back? Is this guy good enough for my baby?

 

In good times, it's always all smiles. But not all times are good. 

 

In my previous life, I worked for many years as a paramedic in Harlem and the South Bronx. Before that, I fought forest fires on a hotshot crew for the US Forest Service. I have seen what stress does to men (and women). I have seen people die. Lots of 'em. Babies too. I have seen how people react, flip out, and lose their shit entirely. And I've seen people fail then recover with grace despite mortal danger.  And in all this, I learned a little bit about judging the character of men. Quickly. For this, I make no apologies.

 

And it is this experience––combined with my own listening and study of the travails of those who have come before me––that informs what I am about to say. 

 

1) Intelligence

 

It should be obvious, but I want to be convinced that the investor is a very smart man. Preferably smarter than me. Steve Young (the 49ers QB with a law degree & his own private equity firm) once said that he aims to be "the dumbest guy in the room." Amen to that.

 

The beauty of hanging around and dealing with really smart people is that they have a  rub off effect. Really smart people challenge you and force you to think bigger, harder and, at the risk of sounding completely vague, better. They pick apart your bad ideas quicker and see through the bullshit that even you might have convinced yourself to believe. 

 

That said, scoring high on the intelligence test is not a dealmaker. Brains is a big plus, but brains without self-knowledge or an approprite level of humility is just fucking dangerous.

 

2) Security & Self-Confidence

 

People who are insecure make bad, irrational decisions. We are all insecure in some way, so really it's just a matter of degree. More is worse, less is better.

 

Generally speaking, being insecure causes you to make decisions based on fear, and people who are motivated by fear alone cannot embrace a big, disruptive vision. They end up being fundamentally risk-averse and drive you to be too. Invariably, this leads to a focus on bullshit, like what other people are doing. 

 

Even worse, you can't honestly call bullshit on people who are insecure without undermining your relationship with them. For me, this is an instant dealbreaker. 

 

People who are secure, on the other hand, like to be challenged. They enjoy vigorous debate. The intellectual swordplay is what they live for. 

 

When someone is secure in themselves and their position, you can be honest with them. And I ONLY want to work with people I can be honest with. Life is just too short and I'm just not that patient. 

 

3) Reverence for the Entrepreneur

 

I can see how easy it is for VCs to think of themselves as masters of the startup universe. As a VC, people compete for your attention and pitch you constantly. They are the judge in a never-ending baby beauty contest. It must get tiring. And in their shoes, I can see how it would be easy to think that the world revolves around you. 

 

But it does not. 

 

At the center of the entrepreneurial universe is the entrepreneur. And behind the entrepreneur is the employees, the team, the company. It is they who are the heros. It is they who operate unhedged. It is they who take the real risk. 

 

 In my mind, good investors get this. They understand their place in the ecosystem as enablers. They don't let their celebrity status get to them. Which brings me to my next point... 

 

4) Humility & Self-knowledge

 

To be humble is to know your strengths and weaknesses, to be aware of your place place in the world. It does not mean being non-confrontational or a softie.

 

My favorite people are those who will push hard and argue vociferously on behalf of an idea but then freely admit that it's possible their assumptions are wrong. They test you, but acknowledge the limits of their own knowledge.  Or maybe they really do know something about your corner of the universe. The important part is that they are acutely aware of when they do know something and when they don't.

 

The other thing that's great about people who possess a high-level of humility and self-knowledge is that they are not afraid of being challenged. Because they don't have huge egos, they are constantly listening to the people around them and learning new things, which in turn makes them amazingly capable as teachers. And god knows I need teachers in my life. 

 

5) Does he understand what it means to be an operator?

 

The investors that scare me most are those who posses a low-level of humility in combination with a non-operational background.

 

Recently, I met a 20-something year old VC from a supposedly top-tier firm who served on the board of several companies. I had looked him up on LinkedIn prior to our meeting and noticed lots of board seats but little other experience beyond a graduate degree from a very prestigous university. He was obviously very intelligent, but after several minutes of opining to me about my industry, I decided to turn the tables a bit and ask...

 

"I noticed that you sit on the board of several companies. Tell me a little bit about your background and experience building companies that qualifies you for this role. What companies have you founded? As a board member, I'd report to you and you'd have the ability to fire me. In essence, you become my boss. Why should I entrust you with this power?"

 

Part of me actually wondered if this guy had had some previous experience that I didn't know about. He squirmed. "Well....ahh," he stuttered. "You know, board members are there to, ahh, give...intelligent feedback and, ahh, be there....ahh....as a sounding board...for the entrepreneur, you know." 

 

What amazed me was not the vacuity of his response but that multiple CEOs had allowed this guy to take a board seat and a position of responsibility caring for their babies. 

 

As far as I can tell,  there's good VCs out there who haven't really been operators. But they tend to have grey hair and not be involved in super-early, seed-stage investing. As a first time founder, I want people around me who can understand and help me manage the extreme uncertainty of company building at the ground floor. 

 

6) Does he want me to lie to him? 

 

One of the red flags I look for is seed investors that want me to make things up and lie to them. This typically manifests itself in the form of long-term financial projections. "What will your sales be 5 years from now?" 

 

I have no fucking clue, and if you're asking me that question, neither do you. 

 

I am a first-time founder in an immature, rapidly growing market. Pricing, exact business model––these things are all up in the air. My task now is to go out and prove certain assumptions about the product and the market in a way that we matched the two up and acheive the magical paradise that is product-market fit. Before I've done that, don't ask me for financial projections other than my expenses, because what you're really doing is asking me to lie to you, and I hate that. 

 

7) Does he teach me things?

 

Some of my favorite investors are those who, regardless of whether they've said yes or no, teach me something about my industry, product, market, team, etc. Even if they say no, they're the ones I'm gonna go back to down the road and try to lure them into the yes column. 

 

My reasoning is this: If in the course of a single 30-minute meeting this person has added value to my company and my life, just imagine how much this person would contribute if he/she sat on my board! MUST HAVE THIS PERSON ON MY TEAM. 

 

8) Is he a happy person? 

 

The world is full of extremely intelligent and yet unhappy people. These people are like poison. Their unhappiness rubs off on you, and invariably, they attempt to punish you and take out their frustrations with their own lot in life on you, potentially disrailing your company and your life. 

 

Again, I don't want you to confuse being happy with being soft. One can be both happy and hard-nosed at the same time. In fact, I like to consider myself a happy warrior. I love life and relish in the entreprenurial adventure, but yet I am (or try to be) ruthless in how I judge and execute that which is important around me and my baby. 

 

At the end of the day, happy people are optimists. And when the world is going to hell, as startups seem wont to do (not to mention life more generally), you need happy, optimistic people around you to stay focused and productive amidst the storm and cataclysm. 

 

Oh yeah, and life is just too short to surround yourself with unhappy people. They suck on your soul, and leave it empty. 

 

I don't know that this is an exhaustive list or even the right one to use, but it's how I think. I hope my thoughts are helpful to and have some positive, enlightening influence on those who come after me. I also hope you my readers will add things that I've missed.

 

I couldn't agree more.

The UX Driven Startup: Crafting an Experience Vision

Do We Really Need Banks?

"Do we really need banks — and what might take their place?")

Imagine for a moment that you did not have a bank account. No debit or credit card, no access to an ATM. No checks, no loans, no savings account. In other words, no access to cheap, reliable, safe and convenient means of saving, borrowing, sending, and spending money.

 

This situation, which may seem truly frightening to you and me, is a daily reality for more than half the people on earth. The majority of people in emerging economies, and a significant minority in developed ones, are unbanked or under-banked. Even the U.S. is home to 106 million under-banked citizens.

 

Yet these underserved markets are now availing of financial services offered by an emerging and dynamic ecosystem of non-banking institutions, which include cell phone companies, small technology vendors and non-governmental organizations. By offering basic financial services that deliver more value at lower cost for more users, players in this emerging ecosystem are threatening the monopoly of banks on financial services, and questioning their very raison d'être.

 

In Kenya, for instance, only 10% of the population has access to traditional banking services. Yet mobile penetration in the country is higher than 50%. Sensing an opportunity, Safaricom, a local telecoms service provider which is 40% owned by U.K.-based Vodafone, launched a service called M-Pesain 2007 to enable people to send/receive and spend small amounts of money using their cellphones.

 

No bank account is required to participate in these transactions, and today, over 8 million Kenyans have subscribed to M-Pesa (more than double the number a year ago!). The Philippines has a similar cell phone-based micro-payments service which has been similarly successful. Meanwhile, in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and India, millions of unbanked rural women have for several years now formed self-help groups to help them save and borrow money to generate income.

 

Developing nations like Kenya, Philippines, and India are leveraging technological innovations like M-Pesa and organizational innovations like self-help groups to drive financial inclusion without involving traditional banks.

 

If you were one of the unbanked of Nairobi, Manila or New Delhi what would prevent you from availing of the financial services of a traditional bricks-and-mortar bank? First, you may be illiterate, and intimidated by the formality of signing up to a bank. Second, you may be on a daily wage and not find the bank's monthly fees affordable or worth the expense. Third, there may not be a bank within easy reach of your town or village.

 

Now let's flip the question. What would prevent traditional banks from reaching out to you? After all, the unbanked represent a huge growth opportunity. In countries like India where over 50% of the population is unbanked, the Central Bank and several state-owned banks have had it as their mission to achieve broader financial inclusion. What has prevented them from making a dent in these figures?

 

The simple answer is the cost of reaching remote and relatively impoverished consumers. India for instance, has over 600,000 villages. Setting up a bank branch in each of these villages would simply, well, break the bank. But branchless services like M-Pesa could help circumvent this fundamental scaling problem facing traditional banks.

 

Now that non-financial institutions are encroaching into their territory, what should traditional banks do?

 

They have two options: fight off these new players or partner with them. While we expect many big banks to keep their heads buried in the sand, nimble banks led by creative CEOs will embrace the "if you can't beat them, join them" principle and plug into alternative banking service ecosystems. In India, for instance, YES Bank — a leading private bank — has partnered with Nokia and Obopay, a mobile payment platform provider, to deliver mobile banking services to even the remotest areas of India. Closer to home, here in the US, Obopay has teamed up with Citi, AT&T, and Verizon to deliver mobile payment services to the 106 million under-banked Americans.

 

As they recover from the recession, can banks regain their relevance globally? Or will the world increasingly ask: Can we do without banks? We believe that the future of banks depends on their ability to adopt and scale up innovations from nonbanking contexts, and transform their parochial culture and mindset in the process. Only then will banks ensure that the frightening scenario outlined at the beginning of this post never materializes (for their own sake!).

 

The next big bank for consumer based transactions will be mobile phone based.

A family over 30 years

dailybooth.com needs a family edition.

Lists made easy + social + fun! - twtPickin

http://twtpick.in/